OK this makes sense, thanks for the reply Shawn.
On 13/03/2021, 21:34, "Shawn Heisey" <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
On 3/13/2021 11:36 AM, Karl Stoney wrote:
> Apologies if this is a silly question, I just can't find anything
explaining the benefits online.
>
> Would anyone be able to tell me why you would use a documentCache, if you
have sufficient RAM on your machine that the OS disk cache is effectively
caching all the documents anyway?
I'm pretty sure that the document cache stores uncompressed data. With
the disk cache, the decompression step would be required, using CPU
resources and taking a little bit of time. Reading from the document
cache would be faster and not hit the CPU as hard.
Since I think version 4.1, Solr (Lucene, really) writes stored fields in
compressed format.
Thanks,
Shawn
Unless expressly stated otherwise in this email, this e-mail is sent on behalf
of Auto Trader Limited Registered Office: 1 Tony Wilson Place, Manchester,
Lancashire, M15 4FN (Registered in England No. 03909628). Auto Trader Limited
is part of the Auto Trader Group Plc group. This email and any files
transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally privileged, and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender.
This email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
