You say not "anything fancy" -- depending on how you define "fancy", if you
have an explicit `shards.preference` param, based on the version you're
running (8.4) you might also take a look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14471. (If SOLR-14471 is the
problem, removing the explicit `shards.preference` param should restore
default "shuffling" routing).

I haven't dug too deep, but it looks like for 8.4 preferLocalShards
actually defaults to false? I might be missing something though:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/releases/lucene-solr/8.4.1/solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/routing/RequestReplicaListTransformerGenerator.java#L85



On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:10 AM Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I could be wrong, but i dont think preferLocalShards is the default in
> multi-shard use cases.
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:07 AM Mike Drob <md...@mdrob.com> wrote:
>
> > I believe a server will always try to prefer local cores. Can you do an
> > experiment with 3 nodes, and send http queries to the node not hosting
> any
> > replicas? That should confirm the balanced distribution.
> >
> > If you have multiple shards, the receiving server will forward the
> requests
> > for shards it doesn’t have, but would still prefer local shards when they
> > are available.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:00 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > A client has a SolrCloud 8.4 setup with two nodes, and one collection
> > with
> > > one shard and replicationFactor=2.
> > > Of course we want search traffic to be evenly distributed between the
> two
> > > replicas.
> > > The client is using plain HTTP requests, no SolrJ or anything fancy,
> and
> > > sends all requests to one of the two nodes.
> > > I was expecting Solr to forward about 50% of those requests to the
> other
> > > replica, but it is serving them all locally.
> > >
> > > I know we can setup an LB in front or re-program the client to do round
> > > robin, but that is not my question.
> > > Is the select-random-replica logic only active when we have a sharded
> > > oollection, and not for a single-shard?
> > >
> > > Jan
> >
>

Reply via email to