yes,group_field is having high cardinality.
Thanks
Parshant Kumar
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 4:06 PM Florin Babes <babesflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your group_field has a high cardinality?
> Thanks,
> Florin Babes
>
> În lun., 8 mar. 2021 la 10:35, Parshant Kumar
> <parshant.ku...@indiamart.com.invalid> a scris:
>
> > Hi florin,
> >
> > I am using below.
> >
> > 1) fq={!collapse field=parentglusrid}
> > 2) expand.rows=4
> > 3) expand=true
> >
> > Size of index is around 100GB.
> > Solr version is 6.5
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 1:46 PM Florin Babes <babesflo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > First let's call the field you collapse on group_field
> > > If group_field has a high cardinality you should make group_field null
> > for
> > > those documents that have a unique group_field and set
> nullPolicy=expand.
> > > By doing that solr will use less memory for it's internal maps (so
> faster
> > > gc) and the head selecting will be faster.
> > > What is your head selecting strategy? Can you share your fq which you
> use
> > > for collapsing?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Florin Babes
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > În lun., 8 mar. 2021 la 06:44, Parshant Kumar
> > > <parshant.ku...@indiamart.com.invalid> a scris:
> > >
> > > > anyone please help
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 4:55 PM Parshant Kumar <
> > > > parshant.ku...@indiamart.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > We have implemented collapse queries in place of grouped queries on
> > our
> > > > > production solr. As mentioned in solr documentation collapse
> queries
> > > are
> > > > > recommended in place of grouped queries in terms of performance .
> But
> > > > after
> > > > > switching to collapsed queries from grouped queries response time
> of
> > > > > queries have increased. This is unexpected behaviour, the response
> > time
> > > > > should have been improved but results are opposites.
> > > > > Please someone help why response time is increased for collapsed
> > > queries.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Parshant Kumar
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
>
--
