On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 05:22:50PM -0400, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > > Since the addition of Active Sync support in SOGo would be a > server-side implementation, there would be a per-mailbox fee to use > it. That fee, would have to be paid to Microsoft directly.
Do you have any ballpark estimates for what that fee would be? I'm worried that such a per-mailbox fee might not scale very well to ISP scale number of mailboxes. At a minimum it must be based on actual ActiveSync usage, not total number of accounts. > Evidently, if we start working on Active Sync support in SOGo, we'll > definitively drop Funambol support - which is probably even more > exciting then adding Active Sync support. :-) -jf -- [email protected] https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
