Dunno, I always use apt-get for installing and thought that it is a bit
dangerous to do workarounds when getting dependency problems since the
packaging system may become damaged. I want everything to be managed by 1
single packaging system so it is easier to maintain a system. I know
aptitude is just a frontend to it. Anyway, why does aptitude have
capabilities of resolving it and is it safe and normal? This is what it all
shows:

##################

root@server:~# aptitude install samba4
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  attr{a} bind9{a} bind9utils{a} ldb-tools{a} libdcerpc-server0{a}
libkdc2-heimdal{a}
  libregistry0{a} libsamba-policy0{a} python-dnspython{a} python-ldb{ab}
python-samba{a}
  python-tdb{ab} samba4{b} samba4-common-bin{a} tdb-tools{a}
0 packages upgraded, 15 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 4,563 kB of archives. After unpacking 23.6 MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 samba4 : Conflicts: samba-tools but 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 is installed.
 python-ldb : Depends: libldb1 (= 1:1.1.4-1) but
1:1.1.4+git20120206-2~inverse1.0 is installed.
 python-tdb : Depends: libtdb1 (= 1.2.9-4) but
1.2.9+git20120207-3~inverse1.0 is installed.
 samba-tools : Conflicts: samba4 but 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 is to be
installed.
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

     Keep the following packages at their current version:
1)     python-ldb [Not Installed]
2)     python-samba [Not Installed]
3)     python-tdb [Not Installed]
4)     samba4 [Not Installed]
5)     samba4-common-bin [Not Installed]



Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]

################


On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Wolfgang Sourdeau <[email protected]>wrote:

> Le 12-05-10 11:05, networdist a écrit :
>
>  PLEASE HELP. Anything else I should run and hows output? Please ask. I am
>> so
>> much up to get this running.
>>
> Why don't you use aptitude and let it select all the dependencies for you?
>
>
> Wolfgang
>
> --
> [email protected]
> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
>
-- 
[email protected]
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Reply via email to