The qpidd binary is built from the qpid-cpp source. On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 4:55 PM Beaudreau, Darin <dbeaudr...@analogic.com.invalid> wrote: > > It appears that was a slight mistake on my part. My coworker pointed out that > he built from the qpid-cpp-43d6b96.tar.gz snapshot and that his compiled > version he called 1.40 because a developer provided an update to solve the > python 3 issues. > > Regardless, I don't need qpid-cpp or qpid-proton. I need qpid-server for the > qpidd binary and associated files. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gordon Sim <g...@redhat.com> > Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 11:36 AM > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: Repackaging qpidd from Centos 7.9 for RHEL 9 > > For qpid-proton the source is here: > https://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-proton-0.38.0/index.html. For qpid-cpp > I don't believe there has been a 1.40 release. The latest is > https://archive.apache.org/dist/qpid/cpp/1.39.0/. Your 1.40 build is > therefore probably built from main https://github.com/apache/qpid-cpp. > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 4:21 PM Beaudreau, Darin > <dbeaudr...@analogic.com.invalid> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I’m reviving a project I inherited from a coworker who was trying to > > migrate our system software from CentOS 7.9 to RedHat 9. Previously, > > he had gone through the process of converting the *qpid-cpp* and > > *qpid-proton* packages to RHEL 9 so that we could test them with our > > software. I have since bundled these together into a single RPM to > > make it simpler for us to deploy, but after deploying, it seems > > there’s still a few components missing. I believe this is because he > > had only converted the packages necessary to compile our code, which > > uses QPID heavily, but he never got as far as actually testing it. The > > main problem seems to be that I’m missing the *qpidd* binary from > > *qpid-server*, as well as the associated system service to run it. > > > > > > > > According to this coworker, he had compiled *qpid-cpp * and > > *qpid-proton* from source from the *qpid-cpp-43d6b96.tar.gz* snapshot. > > It seems he had some initial issues with compiling due to the > > *qpid-python* scripts involved having not been upgraded to Python 3 > > yet, but he was able to resolve that issue. > > > > > > > > My question is, how can I go about locating the correct source package > > for the version of *qpid-server* that I need that would be compatible > > with this version he built for RHEL 9 so that I can build *qpidd* and > > any other required files to include in my deployment RPM? And what > > steps might be required to build it? Are there any issues I should be > > aware of in trying to build it for RHEL 9? The exact versions of > > packages he built from > > were: > > > > > > > > *qpid-cpp-1.40.0.x86_64* > > > > * qpid-proton-0.38.0.x86_64* > > > > > > > > I appreciate any assistance. Let me know if I’ve left out information > > necessary to respond. > > > > > > > > *Darin Beaudreau* > > > > Software Engineer, Analogic Corporation > > > > 8 Centennial Drive, Peabody, MA 01960 > > > > dbeaudr...@analogic.com | > > http://www.a/ > > nalogic.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7CDBeaudreau%40analogic.com%7Cd5a0cfb68a85 > > 4d2f145608dca02d1d13%7C8d6cef0176744e8e9b9f1753140a64ea%7C1%7C0%7C6385 > > 61362910796939%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2l > > uMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cFsl5RhYTnTYp2r > > Dp%2Fqd6a9qQA7%2F762STBj5ZWXjYIg%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Please > report any suspicious attachments, links, or requests for sensitive > information. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
