Hi, Jira issue created: PROTON-2137 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-2137>.
Best regards, Rabih On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 5:01 PM Andrew Stitcher <astitc...@apache.org> wrote: > Please raise a JIRA with all this information and the reproducer - it > is very hard to track fixes without this. > > Also you could attach your patch, but it is easier in this case to use > a github PR with a reference to the JIRA. The Apache automation will > tie them together and this makes it again easier to track. > > Andrew > > On Tue, 2019-11-19 at 18:04 +0000, HADI Ali wrote: > > Hello, > > > > After analysis we discovered that the regression is coming from > > PROTON-2075< > > > https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/commit/e152190459cd75792002d2aae72d351dc22abe27 > > > > ;: [C++] Allow TLS to use system default trusted certificate. > > In fact we noticed that the ssl_client_options and the > > ssl_server_options are not default constructed the same way and that > > the second one< > > > https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/blob/e152190459cd75792002d2aae72d351dc22abe27/cpp/src/ssl_options.cpp#L99 > > > is calling pni_init_ssl_domain< > > > https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/blob/9dd013335de0694bc52848897b17190f297450c1/c/src/ssl/openssl.c#L475 > > > which is taking some time. > > > > What we would like is to avoid initializing ssl when it’s disabled > > from the connection_options. > > Does it sound reasonable for you? Should we create a Jira issue and > > propose a fix? > > > > Thanks, > > Ali & Rabih > > > > From: Rabih M <rabih.prom...@gmail.com> > > Sent: mercredi 13 novembre 2019 19:22 > > To: users@qpid.apache.org > > Subject: [Qpid-proton-cpp] Performance regression found in 0.29.0 > > > > Hello, > > > > We are upgrading in our code the proton version from 0.27.0 to > > 0.29.0. > > While running our unit tests, we found a considerable performance > > regression. > > > > We were able to reproduce the regression in a very simple use case. > > Please find the code attached. > > > > This test takes 1 ms in the version 0.27.0 and 0.28.0 but it takes 73 > > ms in 0.29.0 . > > > > Do you know what might be the cause? > > We will try to investigate in parallel from our side, too. > > > > Thanks, > > Rabih & Ali > > ******************************* > > This e-mail contains information for the intended recipient only. It > > may contain proprietary material or confidential information. If you > > are not the intended recipient you are not authorized to distribute, > > copy or use this e-mail or any attachment to it. Murex cannot > > guarantee that it is virus free and accepts no responsibility for any > > loss or damage arising from its use. If you have received this e-mail > > in error please notify immediately the sender and delete the original > > email received, any attachments and all copies from your system. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org > >
