On 07/28/2016 10:17 AM, Adel Boutros wrote:
Hello,
Out of curiosity, Can I send/receive messages with a queue defined directly on
the dispatch router or do I need to have a real instance of a broker connected
to that dispatcher?
Like Paolo said, you only need a broker if you want to store the message
in a queue.
You can use the router(s) to communicate directly by having the senders
and receivers use the same address. In this case, the exchange of
messages (acknowledgement, settlement, etc.) are routed directly between
the senders and the receivers.
To do this, you don't need a route-container connection and you don't
need auto-links or link-routes. You only need to configure the address
prefix to control whether the deliveries are multicast (all receivers
for the address) or anycast (one receiver for the address). Addresses
that don't match any configured prefix default to balanced-anycast.
You can use a hybrid approach as well, with some addresses defined as
"waypoint" with autolinks and other addresses that are not "waypoint"
that are used for direct producer-to-consumer communication.
I am asking because it seems that the dispatch router has by default some "Addresses"
used for internal communication and I was wondering if I could create an "address" of a
type queue and use it directly without adding connectors.
Router Addresses
class addr phs distrib in-proc local remote cntnr
in out thru to-proc from-proc
===============================================================================================================
local $_management_internal closest 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
local $displayname closest 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
mobile $management 0 closest 1 0 0 0 3
0 0 3 0
local $management closest 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
local temp.9yqNIIHanFkSZbe closest 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Regards,
Adel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
