Hi Andrew, thanks for your reply!

The PIC is because proton will be linked against amqp.so in qpid, which is
a module (dynamic) that will be linked against this static library,
therefore the PIC is required.  Could I have worded that better?


On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Andrew Stitcher <astitc...@redhat.com>wrote:

> On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 12:09 -0500, Shearer, Davin wrote:
> > I would like to share my experience with building proton version 0.6 as a
> > static library.
> > ...
>
> > and since we'll want to support linking this against
> > modules and/or dynamic libraries, we want to build using
> > position-independent code (PIC),
>
> I'm pretty sure this is mistaken: You only need to build -fPIC if the
> code you are building will end up in a dynamic library itself, not if
> you are merely linking against a dynamic library (There are also PIC
> executables for some security purposes but you don't mention that).
>
> The reason for this is that the main executable (including any static
> libraries linked to it) is loaded at a fixed address, whereas dynamic
> libraries could be loaded at any location in the memory map.
>
> Other than the -fPIC I think your patch looks good, and is probably
> generally applicable.
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Davin Shearer
Engineer

8830 Stanford Blvd, Suite 306
Columbia, MD 21045

443-741-4517

Reply via email to