No one is willing to reply?

:(

Constantine


On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 11:33 AM Constantine Dokolas <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I sent this to the "dev" list by mistake. Reposting to "users"...
>
>
> Hi all!
>
> I'm working with a PDF that has an invalid "Annots" dictionary on a page.
> The issue is that the dictionary is just an array of ints (COSInt). Because
> of that, parsing the page throws this exception (this is as it appears in
> the PDFBox debugging app):
>
> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
>> java.io.IOException: Error: Unknown annotation type COSInt{278}
>>
>> org.apache.pdfbox.debugger.pagepane.PagePane$RenderWorker.done(PagePane.java:584)
>>
>> java.desktop/sun.swing.AccumulativeRunnable.run(AccumulativeRunnable.java:112)
>> Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.io.IOException:
>> Error: Unknown annotation type COSInt{278}
>>
>> org.apache.pdfbox.debugger.pagepane.PagePane$RenderWorker.done(PagePane.java:569)
>>
>> java.desktop/sun.swing.AccumulativeRunnable.run(AccumulativeRunnable.java:112)
>> Caused by: java.io.IOException: Error: Unknown annotation type COSInt{278}
>>
>> org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.interactive.annotation.PDAnnotation.createAnnotation(PDAnnotation.java:166)
>>     org.apache.pdfbox.pdmodel.PDPage.getAnnotations(PDPage.java:779)
>>     org.apache.pdfbox.rendering.PageDrawer.drawPage(PageDrawer.java:291)
>>
>> org.apache.pdfbox.rendering.PDFRenderer.renderImage(PDFRenderer.java:348)
>>
>> org.apache.pdfbox.debugger.pagepane.PagePane$RenderWorker.doInBackground(PagePane.java:546)
>>
>> org.apache.pdfbox.debugger.pagepane.PagePane$RenderWorker.doInBackground(PagePane.java:525)
>>     java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1474)
>
>
> Is there, perhaps (I don't expect there is), a way to ignore these
> entries? The issue is that most PDF viewers ignore these entries, but
> PDFBox crashes.
>
> Generally, we have difficulty explaining to our customers that PDFs must
> be well-formed and standards-compliant for us to process them, but the
> usual counter-argument is "but it works with Acrobat!"
> I wonder if anyone has suggestions (that work IRL) on how to counter this
> argument.
>
> Have a great day,
> Constantine
>

Reply via email to