These links should work for at least a week:
Screenshots: https://img4.file-upload.com/i/00298/5ep2gagcmcna.jpg (2.0.4) https://img5.file-upload.com/i/00298/8llrhev3r8oz.jpg (2.0.5) PDF: <http://file-upload.com/d/6FgO>http://wikisend.com/download/185248/out.pdf (need to click the "Download" button) ________________________________ De: Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> Enviado: jueves, 15 de junio de 2017 03:35 p.m. Para: users@pdfbox.apache.org Asunto: Re: Change in image quality between versions 2.0.4 and 2.0.5 (also applies to 2.0.6) Am 15.06.2017 um 02:37 schrieb Esteban R: > > Hello. > > > I have noticed with PDFDebugger that the same pdf is rendered > differently by pdfbox-2.0.4 and by pdfbox-2.0.5 (pdfbox-2.0.6 produces > the same output than pdfbox-2.0.5): the newer versions generate a more > pixelated image. > > > Please find attached a sample pdf and two screenshots of PDFDebugger > in version 2.0.4 and in version 2.0.5 (also applies for version 2.0.6). > Please upload a PDF to a sharehoster, attachments don't get through. It *might* be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1958 [PDFBOX-1958] image mask outline with shading pattern is ...<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1958> issues.apache.org This is also somewhat of a regression: two weeks ago, the attached file had the image rendered in b/w, now it is invisible. I was able to get the image in another ... see the last two comments I made there. Without the change some files would not be rendered at all. > > The old approach is better for our pourposes. Is there a way to revert > to the old rendering? > By using 2.0.4, obviously. Alternatively build from source code a 2.0.6 version, and try to revert the commit mentioned in the issue above. It is possible because the change did not touch very much. But I'd still be interested in seeing your PDF. Tilman
