> 2440 is pretty low - did you check what lowers it, other than the
> single failed network test below?

As far as I can see in agent.log, only thing that lowers that score is "network 
status"
There are a lot of lines like this: 
Penalizing score by 319 due to network status
Penalizing score by 640 due to network status
Penalizing score by 1280 due to network status
Penalizing score by 960 due to network status

> What exactly do you test?
On another vm on same host where which contains hosted engine i tried this:
1. Continuous ping command to 8.8.8.8 (0 lost packages)
2. dig command every second -> dig +tries=1 +time=5 +tcp (no errors, query time 
between 2 and 15ms)

> Before fixing the above bug, we added to ovirt-system-tests loops of
> 'dig', and did see drops - not many, but enough, apparently, and
> often.
> 
> The 'dig' test is not very configurable, from -ha's POV - but you do
> have control over it from elsewhere - resolv.conf, your name server,
> etc. Also, note that it runs 'dig' without passing a query, and the
> default query is for '.' - the root - perhaps your name server has
> some problem with this?
Given that the dig command from the other vm goes through without problems, I 
think the nameserver should be ok.

> You can configure the agent/broker to log at DEBUG level, to see some
> more details.
> 
> You can also change the network monitoring method, and/or configure
> options for methods that do have them - e.g. 'tcp' and
> 'tcp_t_address', 'tcp_t_port'. See e.g.:
> 
> https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/administration_guide/index.html#Admin...
> https://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/sla/hosted-engi...
I will try this, thank you.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/LNNF67WG73WAKV7Z6T57OVZ2XADLVLPC/

Reply via email to