Sorry I hear this hashing term the first time.
So in cockpit this would be a team with 802.3ad LACP / Passive? And you
would put all 4 nics in this team?
In the switch I still have to define a link aggregation (on hp switch a
trunk) with LACP?
Am 24.11.20 um 13:36 schrieb Strahil Nikolov:
If I had 4 x 1GBE , I would consider LACP with hashing on layer 3+4.
For production use, I would go with 10GBE at least.
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
В вторник, 24 ноември 2020 г., 10:40:22 Гринуич+2, jb <jonba...@gmail.com>
написа:
Hello,
here in the description
(https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/gluster-hyperconverged/chap-Single_node_hyperconverged.html)
it says that we should have at least 2 interfaces to separate frontend
and backend traffic.
How is this when I have 4 nics and I make with all one bond interface,
is this not better in terms of performance? What is your recommendation
with 4 x 1Gbit nics?
Best regards
Jonathan
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/P5ZLQLG2TZN56IWZ5HC4ZDST66H5DHLO/
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/C5OPQLQBF7BM4FLH6HL3DKVDCEQTA3NB/
