You should  be able to do that with the POSIX compliant domain ...
If nit, it's better to open a bug so this behaviour is investigated further.

Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn Nov 2, 2019 00:38, TomK <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 10/11/2019 12:10 AM, Strahil wrote: 
> > I'm not sure, but you can try with replica 1 gluster volume. 
> > Later that gluster volume can be changed to replica 2 arbiter 1 or even 
> > better replica 3 volume. 
> > 
>
> Now that I see this I'm not sure we're on the same page. 
>
> Thinking this might clarify a bit better.  Let's take this scenario, 
> assume gluster is working perfectly: 
>
> HOST01 
> 4TB Local LUN /dev/sdb 
> 4TB Gluster FS (brick w/ host02,03) /dev/sdc 
>
>
> HOST02 
> 4TB Local LUN /dev/sdb 
> 4TB Gluster FS (brick w/ host01,03) /dev/sdc 
>
>
> HOST03 
> 4TB Local LUN /dev/sdb 
> 4TB Gluster FS (brick w/ host02,01) /dev/sdc 
>
>
> For each host I need the local LUN to be available for VM's with the 
> GlusterFS storage that's distributed across all three nodes. 
>
> However, when I tried to add a local LUN, the host was removed from the 
> storage domain rendering it unavailable.  Now when I took out the local 
> LUN, I was able to readd that host to the GlusterFS storage domain. 
>
> So it appears I can't add a local LUN when a host is already 
> participating in a GlusterFS storage domain. 
>
>
> Cheers, 
> TK 
>
>
> > 
> > Best Regards, 
> > Strahil NikolovOn Oct 10, 2019 13:04, Tom <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> I take it then theres no way to do so without NFS? 
> >> 
> >> Sent from my iPhone 
> >> 
> >>> On Oct 10, 2019, at 2:53 AM, Strahil <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >>> 
> >>> You can create an NFS on that host and export to itself that local 
> >>> storage... 
> >>> 
> >>> Best Regards, 
> >>> Strahil NikolovOn Oct 9, 2019 07:43, TomK <[email protected]> wrote: 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Manged to reverse it through the options.  Had to deactivate the custom 
> >>>> local cluster. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Now I have my GlusterFS back and want to try and add some local storage 
> >>>> to each host under the same DC, Cluster and Storage Domain.  So 
> >>>> effectively I will have two storage locations.  One on my GlusterFS and 
> >>>> the other on the local storage I've just defined. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Appears I can't make them coexist with oVirt.  Either the host is placed 
> >>>> in a separate cluster with local storage, or I move it back to the 
> >>>> GlusterFS. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Appears I can't have two usable storage types under one host.  Is this 
> >>>> correct? 
> >>>> 
> >>>> What I'm looking for is in the image and shared earlier. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Cheers, 
> >>>> TK 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On 10/8/2019 11:03 PM, TomK wrote: 
> >>>>> I'm working to reverse this scenario. 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> My storage domain still exists.  However I can't activate it.  The 
> >>>>> Manage button is greyed out without clear indication as to why. 
> >>>>> Difficult to tell what my next move should be. 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Anyway to find out? 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Cheers, 
> >>>>> TK 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> On 10/7/2019 8:25 AM, TomK wrote: 
> >>>>>> Allright. 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> So I followed this and configured local storage.  It had some default 
> >>>>>> names that I changed.  It would have been either the default name, or 
> >>>>>> one I choose.  In either case it would be a different name then the 
> >>>>>> Gluster storage domain the host was a part of anyway. 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Once the process completed for both hosts, I noticed the Gluster 
> >>>>>> volume storage domain was offline and the gluster volume was gone.  I 
> >>>>>> can't seem to add that back in anymore.  I get: 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> "Error while executing action DisconnectStorageServerConnection: Error 
> >>>>>> storage server disconnection" 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Guessing I can't have local storage in addition to Gluster on the same 
> >>>>>> hosts and available for VM's? 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Reason why I need that is that Gluster is slow but provides redundancy 
> >>>>>> and live migration.  But I also wanted direct storage for VM's 
> >>>>>> requiring faster IO.  So here's my sc
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: 
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: 
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/SI2CDIY34NIXLXOWN3NI4UKCUB6DQ26U/

Reply via email to