On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 12:47 +0000, Karli Sjöberg wrote: > On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 11:14 +0000, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:11 PM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi@gm > > ai > > l.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Karli Sjöberg <karli.sjoberg@slu > > > .s > > > e> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your answer, K! > > > > > So you mean to make a unique bond composed by all 4 network > > > > > > > > adapters and put all the networks on it, comprised ovirtmgmt > > > > and > > > > such, through clans? > > > > > How do you configure 802.3ad on 4 adapters? How many switches > > > > > > > > do you have to connect to, from these 4 adapters? Or do you use > > > > round robin bonding (but I presume it is not supported in court > > > > this bond)? > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Well, in our case, we have two clustered switches from C- > > > > company > > > > so two NICs in each. And then, yeah, different VLANs for every > > > > network on top of the same bond. Works like a charm:) > > > > /K > > > > > > > > > > Hello K, > > > coming back to the question, I have only 1 VLAN dedicated to > > > Netapp > > > NFS infrastructure and I can't manage to add another. > > > Can I manage to use anyway 802.3ad on 4 adapters using any > > > particular option for this bonding mode at oVirt and switch > > > side? > > > I think that at network side we have 4 x 3130 clustered Cisco > > > switches so in theory I can use this bonding mode. > > > I don't know if I can configure more than one IP on the same lan > > > inside one Netapp svm to configure more that one NFS share. > > > And if 802.3ad mode would assure to use 2 different network > > > adapters when pointing to 2 different ips on the same network for > > > the shares > > > > > > > And multiple mount points, hence multiple SDs? They might, or might > > not use the same physical NIC. > > Y. > > In my experience, they will use the same NIC. You need, at least, two > addresses in different subnets for 802.3ad to load balance between > the > interfaces. > > /K
P.S. The only thing I can say for sure is that proper load balancing will occur with separate VLAN interfaces and addresses in different subnets. That much I know, because that´s how we did it:) Just using addresses in different subnets may work too, I just don´t know. Please try and post your results:) /K > > > > > > And I have to configure parameters for bonding in oVirt too, in > > > case I have to set any particular one.. > > > > > > Thanks again, > > > Gianluca > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
