On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Bryan Sockel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes that is the document i have been looking at, unfortunately i am still > pretty new to the ovirt/gluster world. But both seem like the would be a > great fit for our goals. > Indeed it will be a great solution for specific scenarios. If you can afford to wait for a few months a robust hyperonvergence integration, you can start playing with it knowing that today it's still not production ready. Any feedback on that solution will be really appreciated. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simone Tiraboschi <[email protected]> > To: Bryan Sockel <[email protected]> > Cc: users <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 18:12:29 +0200 > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Hardware setup > > > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Bryan Sockel <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am looking to put together a configuration setup for a new install and >> was wondering if it is ok for have both gluster and ovirt running on the >> same systems, or if it was better to separate my storage on to anther >> platform? >> >> I am currently looking into 3 servers with 196 GB Ram, dual 6 core proc's >> on each server. Gluster would be installed on each server with a 3 way >> replica, ovirt would be running as an appliance and each node would be part >> of the ovirt cluster. >> >> > > That approach is called hyper-converged. > With 4.0 is still somehow bleeding edge and not recommended for a > production env; a stable solution will come quite early. > If you want start playing with it you can take a look at this article > which exactly covers what you want to do: > https://www.ovirt.org/blog/2016/08/up-and-running-with- > ovirt-4-0-and-gluster-storage/ > > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
