On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Michal Skrivanek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Not sure why it is proposed just now and not before. > > The -lxc package is not used by oVirt, so it will just sit there. > > The libvirt-daemon-config-network package should be harmless, it just > contains > > the configuration fir libvirt's default bridge ‘virbr0' > > well, harmless….though for a good reason we stopped pulling in “libvirt” > as the metapackage brings problematic deps in certain cases (iirc it was > due to ppc64le) > That’s why we depend on exactly just > libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter libvirt-daemon-kvm libvirt-lock-sanlock > libvirt-client libvirt-python > > As Francesco says it’s mostly harmless, it’s just that on a truly clean > environment “libvirt” wouldn’t be installed > > Thanks, > michal > > > Ok, and indeed in my system is not installed... so the question is why inside the web admin gui there is a complaint about libvirt missing if not needed: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mveWNDNWpZdjIwV0U/view?usp=sharing
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
