How can it lead into packet duplication when the passive should not be active and only it's mac-address should be visible on the switch to prevent confusion on the switch ?
For a VRRP setup on the switch there is no other option then mode=1 as far as I know ? 2016-07-13 14:50 GMT+02:00 Pavel Gashev <[email protected]>: > I would say that bonding breaks CARP somehow. In example mode=1 can lead to > packet duplication, so pfsense can receive it's own packets. Try firewall in > pfsense all incomming packets that have the same source MAC address as > pfsense. > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Matt ." <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday 13 July 2016 at 15:29 > To: Pavel Gashev <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] CARP Fails on Bond mode=1 > > Hi Pavel, > > No it's Pfsense, so FreeBSD. > > Is there something different there ? > > > > 2016-07-13 13:59 GMT+02:00 Pavel Gashev <[email protected]>: >> Matt, >> >> How is CARP implemented? Is it OpenBSD? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: <[email protected]> on behalf of "Matt ." >> <[email protected]> >> Date: Wednesday 13 July 2016 at 12:42 >> Cc: users <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] CARP Fails on Bond mode=1 >> >> Hi Pavel, >> >> This is done and used without the Bond before. >> >> Now I applied a bond it goes wrong and I'm searching but can't find a >> thing about it. >> >> >> >> 2016-07-13 11:03 GMT+02:00 Pavel Gashev <[email protected]>: >>> Matt, >>> >>> In order to use CARP/VRRP in a VM you have to disable MAC spoofing >>> prevention. >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-May/032839.html >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: <[email protected]> on behalf of "Matt ." >>> <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tuesday 12 July 2016 at 21:58 >>> To: users <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [ovirt-users] CARP Fails on Bond mode=1 >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I have been testing bonding with a vm connected to the network on this >>> bond mode=1 (vlans on top of it) where the vm uses a carp IP for >>> failover. >>> >>> It seems that when the VM which holds the Carp IP and so is Master you >>> can ping both IP's, so interface IP and Carp IP, but you cannot >>> throw/route any traffic over it. >>> >>> You can route traffic over the interface IP of the Carp Slave. >>> >>> Is this known or just not possible ? >>> >>> I hope it's a "bug" :) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Matt >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
