On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:00:14PM -0400, John Taylor wrote: > Chris Adams <[email protected]> writes: > > > Once upon a time, Sven Kieske <[email protected]> said: > >> On 13/03/15 12:29, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: > >> > We also face this problem since 3.5 in two different installations... > >> > Hope it's fixed soon > >> > >> Nothing will get fixed if no one bothers to > >> open BZs and send relevants log files to help > >> track down the problems. > > > > There's already an open BZ: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158108 > > > > I'm not sure if that is exactly the same problem I'm seeing or not; my > > vdsm process seems to be growing faster (RSS grew 952K in a 5 minute > > period just now; VSZ didn't change). > > For those following this I've added a comment on the bz [1], although in > my case the memory leak is, like Chris Adams, a lot more than the 300KiB/h > in the original bug report by Daniel Helgenberger . > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158108
That's interesting (and worrying). Could you check your suggestion by editing sampling.py so that _get_interfaces_and_samples() returns the empty dict immediately? Would this make the leak disappear? Dan. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
