Hi,
> > > > Hi, > > answer below > > > > > > Nir Soffer <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I attach the file. Below log in the vdsm.log.62.xz > > > > > > > > > > > > The given nonexistent disk has probably appeared after template > > > > removal > > > > > > from which it has been created. > > > > > > BUT it was independent and before problems was not, after template > > > > > > removal! > > > > > > The disk exists, but at it has changed ID! > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand this description. > > > > > > > > > > Can you describe to steps to reproduce this issue? > > > > > > > > > > Guessing from your description: > > > > > 1. Create vm with x disks > > > > > 2. Create template > > > > > 3. Create vm from template > > > > > 4. Remove template > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > 1. Create vm with x disks on the DS 3524 through FC (multipathd on > > vdsm) > > > > 2. Create template > > > > 3. Create vm (independent) from template > > > > 4. Start vm and job in the vm > > > > 5. Remove template > > > > 6. Stop vm > > > > 7. Don`t start vm with error > > > > > > Do you mean - start vm fail with error about missing lv? > Yes > > > > > > > > 8. seek it disk - #lsblk > > > > > > Can you share the output of lsblk both before and after you stop the vm? No, since vm does not start! > > > > > > > > 9. many command with block 253:20 > > > > > > Not sure what do you mean by that > > You did not explain what you mean Hm, ?? vgchange .... > > > > Note: do *not* activate all lvs using "vgchange -a y" > > > Only vdsm should activate its volumes. > > > > OK! If vm don`t start, how to take data from vm? > > Of course if you need to troubshoot the system, and the vm is not > running, there is no problem to access the lv directly. > > Even then, you should *not* activate all lvs in a vg using > > vgchange -a y > > But activate only the lv you want to access using > > lvchange -a y Thank you, did not know > > > > > > > > > > 10. mount finded lvm in lvm volume and save data > > > > > > Mount? how mount is related to lvm? > > > > VM disk is lv on vdsm. I mounted lv, inside lvm on lv vdsm! > > You mean you activate the lv on the host? Yes, intro LVM vdsm > > > > > 12. reboot all vdsm host > > > > 13. dont't find ID it disk! ID it disk changed! > > > > > > Please share output of lvs both before and after the vm is stopped. > > > > Before > > -/dev/9d53ecef-8bfc-470b-8867-836bfa7df137/ > fb8466c9-0867-4e73-8362-2c95eea89a83 > > After - > > /dev/9d53ecef-8bfc-470b-8867-836bfa7df137/33b905e2-23df-49a9- > b772-4ebda3b0cd22 > > This not the output of lvs, these are the symlinks to the active lvs. > > Can you share the lvs output before and after the vm is stopped? No, since the vm does not start! > > > > > Now the problem disk has again received old ID(lvdisplay), BUT I have > > already removed it! > > I'm not sure what you mean. Can you share the output of lvdisplay before > and after the operation? > Already is not present, I have removed this problem disk > > > > The Mysticism! > > > > At me 3 disks on 9 GB, 5 days ago I have removed them. Now I them see till > > now (lvdisplay on the vdsm host) Why? > > Did you update lvm cache using "pvscan --cache"? No. I should after each operation with disks, do in the console "pvscan - cache"? > > > > > In general my problem has begun that on Windows 2008 Vm the empty seat has > > come to an end. > > What do you mean by that? This is first problem! Second problem - don't start the vm. > > > I have expanded volume in web gui. When I began to expand > > a disk in VM - error. > > > lvdisplay on the vdsm host has shown the old size of > > a disk! > > Is the volume preallocated or thin provisioned? All my disks - prelocated. > > Preallocated volumes are extended when you modify the volume size in > engine ui (as you described). Thin provisioned volumes are extended > only when the available space is bellow a threshold, so the lv > size will not change after you modify the volume size. > > > > > Sometimes normally all works! > > Do you mean that now everything works? The VM it has been removed, since for a week I could not start it! Now all works on others VM. But there were 2 problems! My problem to understand, that I have made not so or it is a problem oVirt. I wish to use oVirt, but is not assured of it because of these problems! > > > > > How I understand, probably, "all ok" when you work with VM which are on > > SPM host??! > > Lost you here. It agree, a head around )) Thanks Roma
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
