Il 17/03/2014 13:15, Brian Proffitt ha scritto: > I would have no issue manually doing this, but the problem is as soon as I > do, every page will automatically be updated to today's date with my name as > soon as I hit "Save." So a bot might be good. Or a template change. >
I guess we can just go over http://www.ovirt.org/Special:AncientPages, contact owner / writer of the page / feature and ask him / her to update to current status. > BKP > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <[email protected]> >> To: "Dave Neary" <[email protected]>, "Bob Doolittle" >> <[email protected]>, "users" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 8:03:23 AM >> Subject: Re: [Users] Request for Wiki - dates >> >> Il 14/03/2014 18:16, Dave Neary ha scritto: >>> Hi Bob, >>> >>> What I'd love to see is a way for people to flag content out-of-date. >>> "Last updated" doesn't tell you about the feature that is stable and >>> unchanged since 3.0, nor does it tell you that the feature is in >>> constant flux and the latest commit just changed everything. >>> >>> You need 2 dates for maximum usefulness: "Last updated", and "Flagged >>> out of date" - if last updated is after the flagged date, something is >>> wrong (flag should have been removed). If the flag is there then the >>> page needs updating. Ideally, flagging the page would indicate the >>> reason for the flag. >>> >>> Anyone know how you'd do this in a maintainable way in MediaWiki? >> >> Looking at mediawiki the only way I see is flagging all pages not updated in >> the last month with >> >> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Outdated >> >> And having people to review them. >> I'm not sure if a bot can do the work of automatically flagging all pages not >> updated. >> >> >> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Dave. >>> >>> On 03/13/2014 05:53 PM, Bob Doolittle wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> As most are aware, there's a lot of information on the Ovirt Wiki that's >>>> out of date. In spite of our best efforts, that will probably always be >>>> true - it's the nature of Wikis. >>>> >>>> When I look for information on our Wiki, I never know where the most >>>> current information is. >>>> >>>> I think it would be really helpful if someplace on each Wiki page was a >>>> useful date to let us know the currency of the info. Probably the most >>>> useful date is last-modified, although creation date might also be >>>> useful. Maybe we could even map/display the date to the version number >>>> of whatever the current stable release was at the time for context >>>> (sometimes the content of a page calls out a particular version it's >>>> addressing, but a lot of the time it does not). >>>> >>>> Just as an example, I want to find out about migrating my existing >>>> configuration to self-hosted, using 3.4 RC2. A google search shows the >>>> following links (in order shown): >>>> >>>> http://www.ovirt.org/Features/Self_Hosted_Engine >>>> http://www.ovirt.org/Migrate_to_Hosted_Engine >>>> http://www.ovirt.org/Hosted_Engine_Howto >>>> ... >>>> >>>> I'm sure the Features page is ancient at this point. It's hard to tell >>>> about the 2nd page. >>>> >>>> Of course the date a page was last modified doesn't directly indicate >>>> how correct/current the information is, but there's a correlation. >>>> Knowing the date would be useful in making a judgment. It might even >>>> help the task of identifying and cleaning up obsolete pages. >>>> >>>> Easy to do? >>>> >>>> -Bob >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> >> >> -- >> Sandro Bonazzola >> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. >> See how it works at redhat.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
