Hi, Dan Yasny schreef op 6-2-2014 16:38: > This is the same question as in RHEL or Fedora IMO: do you want the > bleeding edge features and lower code stability and reliability, or do > you want to have techsupport (and that means a real SLA and an > escalation path up to the engineering, if need be) behind you, stable > and reliable, well tested code, but less of the advanced features.
Thank you, this is what I thought. It's still a hard decision. If the stability and "testedness" of RHEL is anything to go by, it's not reassuring at all (although it may be better than Fedora, I don't know), although I must say that RedHat support is helpful at times. Thanks again, I think I know enough :-) Best regards, Martijn Grendelman > > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Martijn Grendelman > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi, > > This may be the wrong place to ask, but I'm looking for input to form an > opinion on an "oVirt or RHEV" question within my company. > > I have been running oVirt for about 5 months now, and I'm quite > comfortable with its features and maintenance procedures. We are now > planning to build a private virtualization cluster for hosting clients' > applications as well as our own. Some people in the company are > questioning whether we should buy RHEV, but at this point, I can't see > the benefits. > > Can anyone on this list shed a light on when RHEV might be a better > choice than oVirt? What are the benefits? The trade-offs? > > I am looking for pragmatic, real-world things, not marketing mumbo > jumbo. That, I can get from redhat.com <http://redhat.com> ;-) > > Best regards, > Martijn. > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
