On 01/18/2014 04:52 PM, Peter Styk wrote:
So I got ovirtmgmt VM ticked off. Had to remove it from all VM's then
tried to add new Logical network to eth0 by drag & drop but refused
since ovirtmgmt was out of sync. So I synced it. ....and that's how I
lost access to my hosted remote system. End of story. So that's it I
guess, automated install doesn't work (during switch network goes dead
and doesn't come back remote access is lost) so I found manual way that
works. But then I need to sync it to get my ovirtmgmt not to be a VM
network. And even if its not to get another network on the interface i
need to sync it.....

this sounds like a bug - can you provide clear reproduction steps?


I will keep trying, Thanks for the tips.
P.





On 17 January 2014 22:06, Itamar Heim <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 01/18/2014 12:05 AM, William Kwan wrote:

        I tried to define a virtual interface for vlan102, by
        adding ifcfg-bond0.102
        manually and restarted network services.


    why not via ovirt-engine?





        On Friday, January 17, 2014 4:45 PM, Itamar Heim
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
        On 01/17/2014 11:38 PM, William Kwan wrote:
          > OK..  tested with bond0.102 for vlan102
          > I guess I can't do this with oVirt?  It wouldn't pickup this
        interface.
          > It still shows up eth0, eth1 and bond0 only

        you tried to define a vlan youself on the bond, or use a vlan via a
        logical network over the bond via ovirt-engine (which should work)?


          >
          > Will
          >
          >
          >
          > On Friday, January 17, 2014 1:15 PM, William Kwan
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
          > Thanks all for the info. I'm trying the suggestions with
        3.3.2-1.el6
          >
          > Assaf mentioned the following which is true.
          > You can make ovirtmgmt a non-VM, untagged (non-VLAN)
        network, then place
          > as many VM, tagged networks as you'd like on the same NIC or
        bond.
          >
          > I tried a few things and I haven't been able to find a way
        through.
          > Obviously or not, there are more facts/rules.  Just put up a
        few of them
          > here
          >
          > Cannot have more than one non-VLAN network on one interface
          > Cannot have a non-VLAN VM network and VLAN-tagged networks
        on one
          > interface. ( got this when I tried to drag a VLAN-tagged VM
        network on
          > the same interface as the non-VLAN VM network).
          >
          > I'll try to test adding a bond0.<vlan>.  I need to have
          > bond0 - for both mgmt network and a vlan
          > bond1 - for another subnet.
          >
          > Will
          >
          >
          >
          >
          > On Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:50 PM, Juan Pablo Lorier
          > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
          > Hi William,
          >
          > You can have several logical networks on the same interface. If
          > ovirtmgmt is not a vm network you can even mix tagged and
        untagged
          > networks (if not, you can't mix). You don's have to do
        anything besides
          > creating the logical networks in ovirt and assign them to
        the interface,
          > ovirt takes care of creating the virtual interfaces it needs.
          > What you can't do is have more than one logical network per
        vlan (I
          > think there's a feature request on this, I know I've asked
        it on the
          >
          > list:-) ).
          > Regards,

          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          >
          > _________________________________________________
          > Users mailing list
          > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
          > http://lists.ovirt.org/__mailman/listinfo/users
        <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>

          >




    _________________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.ovirt.org/__mailman/listinfo/users
    <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>



_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to