There's are already enaugh articles on the web about NFS problems related locking, latency, etc.... Eh stacking a protocol onto another to fix problem and then maybe one more to glue them together.
Google for the suse PDF " why NFS sucks", I don't agree with the whole sheet.. NFS got his place,too. But not as production filer for VM. Cheers, Juergen, the NFS lover On Jan 9, 2014 8:10 AM, "Markus Stockhausen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Von: [email protected] [[email protected]]" im Auftrag von > "squadra [[email protected]] > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2014 17:15 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: [Users] Experience with low cost NFS-Storage as VM-Storage? > > > > better go for iscsi or something else... i whould avoid nfs for vm > hosting > > Freebsd10 delivers kernel iscsitarget now, which works great so far. or > go with omnios to get comstar iscsi, which is a rocksolid solution > > > > Cheers, > > > > Juergen > > That is usually a matter of taste and the available environment. > The minimal differences in performance usually only show up > if you drive the storage to its limits. I guess you could help Sven > better if you had some hard facts why to favour ISCSI. > > Best regards. > > Markus
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
