-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 29 Dec 2013, Itamar Heim wrote:
> > I for one would very much like to see this built. I was surprised to learn > > that this was not handled already, because if live snap works in Fedora, why > > not CentOS, you know... > did anyone ask centos to simply build with this flag to > enable these features? The CentOS bug tracker is open for suggestions from all The RHEL buildsystem flags used are not published systematically by Red Hat, in any venue that I am that I am aware of. Obviously command line 'defines' and build environment cause certain conditionals in a .spec file to be triggered, one way or the other. Also the presence of -devel type packages in a build chroot, not explicitly enumerated through BuildRequires cause the auto-tools to add options conditionally. Tool versions not publically released sometimes are used to build packages [there were 'header marks' from a gcc [and implied toolchain], that was never externally released by Red Hat in the early 6 series, as I recall]. And so on. The complexity explodes combinatorially ... and so a SRPM rebuild effort [of which CentOS is one] builds, and tests, sometimes with ldd, and sometimes in other ways, to see that a 'close enough' reproduction of the binaries issued by Red Hat, are achieved Out of curiousity, _what_ build environment 'flags' do you all, participating in this thread, refer to? -- the thread does not enumerate them explicitly, and one cannot expect to hit by 'indirect fire', a target not exposed With best regards, this New Year's eve - -- Russ herrold -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlLDjcgACgkQMRh1QZtklkRMWACeJpv5D4Lmo/pk+bn/fdVEBYCY JscAn369cgjOKVUZqJHrAYjRu/XkodCl =d1tY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
