yes , you are right, I do get the same virtuozzo-release as mentioned in the initial subject, sorry for the noise .
# cat /etc/virtuozzo-release OpenVZ release 7.0.14 (136) but anyway, I don't see any ploop / fsck error in the host /var/log/vzctl.log inside the CT , where did you see those errors ? Jehan . De: "jjs - mainphrame" <j...@mainphrame.com> À: "OpenVZ users" <users@openvz.org> Envoyé: Jeudi 2 Juillet 2020 19:33:23 Objet: Re: [Users] Issues after updating to 7.0.14 (136) Thanks for that sanity check, the conundrum is resolved. vzlinux-release and virtuozzo-release are indeed different things. Jake On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:27 AM Jonathan Wright < [ mailto:jonat...@knownhost.com | jonat...@knownhost.com ] > wrote: /etc/redhat-release and /etc/virtuozzo-release are two different things. On 7/2/20 12:16 PM, jjs - mainphrame wrote: BQ_BEGIN Jehan - I get the same output here - [root@annie ~]# yum repolist |grep virt virtuozzolinux-base VirtuozzoLinux Base 15,415+189 virtuozzolinux-updates VirtuozzoLinux Updates 0 I'm baffled as to how you're on 7.8.0 while I'm at 7.0,15 even though I'm fully up to date. # uname -a Linux [ http://annie.ufcfan.org/ | annie.ufcfan.org ] 3.10.0-1127.8.2.vz7.151.10 #1 SMP Mon Jun 1 19:05:52 MSK 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Jake On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:08 AM Jehan PROCACCIA < [ mailto:jehan.procac...@imtbs-tsp.eu | jehan.procac...@imtbs-tsp.eu ] > wrote: BQ_BEGIN no factory , just repos virtuozzolinux-base and openvz-os # yum repolist |grep virt virtuozzolinux-base VirtuozzoLinux Base 15 415+189 virtuozzolinux-updates VirtuozzoLinux Updates 0 Jehan . De: "jjs - mainphrame" < [ mailto:j...@mainphrame.com | j...@mainphrame.com ] > À: "OpenVZ users" < [ mailto:users@openvz.org | users@openvz.org ] > Cc: "Kevin Drysdale" < [ mailto:kevin.drysd...@iomart.com | kevin.drysd...@iomart.com ] > Envoyé: Jeudi 2 Juillet 2020 18:22:33 Objet: Re: [Users] Issues after updating to 7.0.14 (136) Jehan, are you running factory? My ovz hosts are up to date, and I see: [root@annie ~]# cat /etc/virtuozzo-release OpenVZ release 7.0.15 (222) Jake On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:08 AM Jehan Procaccia IMT < [ mailto:jehan.procac...@imtbs-tsp.eu | jehan.procac...@imtbs-tsp.eu ] > wrote: BQ_BEGIN "updating to 7.0.14 (136)" !? I did an update yesterday , I am far behind that version # cat /etc/vzlinux-release Virtuozzo Linux release 7.8.0 (609) # uname -a Linux localhost 3.10.0-1127.8.2.vz7.151.14 #1 SMP Tue Jun 9 12:58:54 MSK 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux why don't you try to update to latest version ? Le 29/06/2020 à 12:30, Kevin Drysdale a écrit : BQ_BEGIN Hello, After updating one of our OpenVZ VPS hosting nodes at the end of last week, we've started to have issues with corruption apparently occurring inside containers. Issues of this nature have never affected the node previously, and there do not appear to be any hardware issues that could explain this. Specifically, a few hours after updating, we began to see containers experiencing errors such as this in the logs: [90471.678994] EXT4-fs (ploop35454p1): error count since last fsck: 25 [90471.679022] EXT4-fs (ploop35454p1): initial error at time 1593205255: ext4_ext_find_extent:904: inode 136399 [90471.679030] EXT4-fs (ploop35454p1): last error at time 1593232922: ext4_ext_find_extent:904: inode 136399 [95189.954569] EXT4-fs (ploop42983p1): error count since last fsck: 67 [95189.954582] EXT4-fs (ploop42983p1): initial error at time 1593210174: htree_dirblock_to_tree:918: inode 926441: block 3683060 [95189.954589] EXT4-fs (ploop42983p1): last error at time 1593276902: ext4_iget:4435: inode 1849777 [95714.207432] EXT4-fs (ploop60706p1): error count since last fsck: 42 [95714.207447] EXT4-fs (ploop60706p1): initial error at time 1593210489: ext4_ext_find_extent:904: inode 136272 [95714.207452] EXT4-fs (ploop60706p1): last error at time 1593231063: ext4_ext_find_extent:904: inode 136272 Shutting the containers down and manually mounting and e2fsck'ing their filesystems did clear these errors, but each of the containers (which were mostly used for running Plesk) had widespread issues with corrupt or missing files after the fsck's completed, necessitating their being restored from backup. Concurrently, we also began to see messages like this appearing in /var/log/vzctl.log, which again have never appeared at any point prior to this update being installed: /var/log/vzctl.log:2020-06-26T21:05:19+0100 : Error in fill_hole (check.c:240): Warning: ploop image '/vz/private/8288448/root.hdd/root.hds' is sparse /var/log/vzctl.log:2020-06-26T21:09:41+0100 : Error in fill_hole (check.c:240): Warning: ploop image '/vz/private/8288450/root.hdd/root.hds' is sparse /var/log/vzctl.log:2020-06-26T21:16:22+0100 : Error in fill_hole (check.c:240): Warning: ploop image '/vz/private/8288451/root.hdd/root.hds' is sparse /var/log/vzctl.log:2020-06-26T21:19:57+0100 : Error in fill_hole (check.c:240): Warning: ploop image '/vz/private/8288452/root.hdd/root.hds' is sparse The basic procedure we follow when updating our nodes is as follows: 1, Update the standby node we keep spare for this process 2. vzmigrate all containers from the live node being updated to the standby node 3. Update the live node 4. Reboot the live node 5. vzmigrate the containers from the standby node back to the live node they originally came from So the only tool which has been used to affect these containers is 'vzmigrate' itself, so I'm at something of a loss as to how to explain the root.hdd images for these containers containing sparse gaps. This is something we have never done, as we have always been aware that OpenVZ does not support their use inside a container's hard drive image. And the fact that these images have suddenly become sparse at the same time they have started to exhibit filesystem corruption is somewhat concerning. We can restore all affected containers from backups, but I wanted to get in touch with the list to see if anyone else at any other site has experienced these or similar issues after applying the 7.0.14 (136) update. Thank you, Kevin Drysdale. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [ mailto:Users@openvz.org | Users@openvz.org ] [ https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users | https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users ] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [ mailto:Users@openvz.org | Users@openvz.org ] [ https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users | https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users ] BQ_END _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [ mailto:Users@openvz.org | Users@openvz.org ] [ https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users | https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users ] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [ mailto:Users@openvz.org | Users@openvz.org ] [ https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users | https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users ] BQ_END _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [ mailto:Users@openvz.org | Users@openvz.org ] [ https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users | https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users ] BQ_END -- Jonathan Wright KnownHost, LLC [ https://www.knownhost.com/ | https://www.knownhost.com ] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [ mailto:Users@openvz.org | Users@openvz.org ] [ https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users | https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users ] BQ_END _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
