Le 31/05/2017 à 11:20, Pavel Emelyanov a écrit :
On 05/30/2017 06:18 PM, Jehan Procaccia wrote:
Le 30/05/2017 à 10:46, Vasily Averin a écrit :
Dear OpenVZ users,
could you please share your feedback on Vz7?
How do you perceive Virtuozzo VMs vs others (Oracle or KVM VMs) ?
I appreciate the use of prlctl to list and manage my VM and CT in one
single tool
BTW, how do you make a choice which on (CT or VM) to use when you create
one? Is there any automation you use?
I choose between VM or CT manually ,
when I need a service that is using deep kernel base services (VPN,
firewall, HA-LVS, probe network ...) I choose a VM
when it's for basic services a CT
as a OpenVz7 admin, I am missing live backup/snapshot of my KVMs , I
know it is available commercialy through virtuozzo7 though ...
aside virtuozzo OS I also use KVM on traditional centos 7 distrib, but I
really appreciate the mixe of KVM and CT on a single host provided by OVz7
the 3 mounths wait for kernel updates can also be an issue, but again I
understand it is a way to drive us to the commercial version .
How do you perceive Virtuozzo Containers vs others (Oracle containers, Docker
containers, etc) ?
I don't use/know Oracle containers, neither LXC , regarding Dockers for
me it is a different concept, not a full VM but an application
container dedicated to a specific and temporal job
Would you like to see support for such kind of ... entities on the OpenVZ host?
Or inside CT/VM? Or at all somewhere in your server room :)
by "kind of entities", you mean "application container dedicated to a
specific and temporal job" kind of Dockers ?
I don't need tham right now , but if it comes a day ... more probably as
an entity on the OpenVZ host .
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
