Quotes is a problem and pain for many containers, you are absolutely right. But this issue can be solved if we can manage and create zfs subvolumes from inside containers.
Ploop is a very good storage layout but it has big amount of issues inherited from ext4. But what about btrfs? From my point its not stable even in rhel7. But for next 5-7 years we should use rhel7 openvz kernel which haven't stable btrfs. Thus btrfs is not suitable for production usage with containers now. But ZFS can provide all modern features now and it should be named as "best filesystfm fof containers" ! But ZFS has some performace issues related with deduplication and compression. But this issues can be solved ;) I'm already have few servers with ZFS and OpenVZ and do many tests with it. All together we can test all cases and provide complete community driven support for ZFS;) On Thursday, November 13, 2014, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odint...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello! > > Nfsv3 is officially supported but nfsv4 is not yet supported. > > On Thursday, November 13, 2014, Roman Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','reduz...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 16:28 -0500, Devon B. wrote: >> > Ploop requires ext4 as the host filesystem according to bug 2277: >> > https://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2277 >> >> >> We do run ploop based CTs on NFS storage successfully. I wonder now if >> that is a setup that is not officially supported. >> >> Any comments on that? >> >> Roman >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@openvz.org >> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > -- > Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov > -- Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
