Josip Rodin <joy-twbef3gwir6qvbxzion...@public.gmane.org> writes:
> A lot of this namespace code was submitted into the mainline kernel by > OpenVZ developers, so in a way they helped enable this. On the other hand > the troubling bit for OpenVZ users may be the apparently missing link on > this end - scarce movement in OpenVZ itself to adjust to these new > interfaces in new kernels, we're stuck on 2.6.27 (or even 2.6.18)... Once lxc gets far enough along, is there still reason to stick with OpenVZ? The Virtuozzo management tools + file system etc. would still be as useful with an lxc backend as they are now with an OpenVZ backend, it seems. /Benny _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users