Josip Rodin <joy-twbef3gwir6qvbxzion...@public.gmane.org> writes:

> A lot of this namespace code was submitted into the mainline kernel by
> OpenVZ developers, so in a way they helped enable this. On the other hand
> the troubling bit for OpenVZ users may be the apparently missing link on
> this end - scarce movement in OpenVZ itself to adjust to these new
> interfaces in new kernels, we're stuck on 2.6.27 (or even 2.6.18)...

Once lxc gets far enough along, is there still reason to stick with
OpenVZ? The Virtuozzo management tools + file system etc. would still be
as useful with an lxc backend as they are now with an OpenVZ backend, it
seems.


/Benny


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to