-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list,
I have a scenario that leaves me sitting here, scratching my head wondering whether I need to do some brigding or not: There's my HN having two NICs, on both of them several VLANs are tagged. VLAN123, for example, exists on both interfaces (eth0 and eth1, respectively). This way I successfully created a VE that holds two veth devices (eth0.123 and eth1.123). Now, the constellation changed and I have the problem that I may have to assign a VLAN/veth interface to *multiple* VEs, e.g. VLAN123 (eth0.123) VLAN124 (eth0.124) VLAN125 (eth0.125) should be accessable from VE 101, 102, and 103. AFAICS I can only 'transfer' a single VLAN to a veth, so I could assign eth0.123 to veth101.0. Could I still assign eth.123 to veth102.0 of VE 102, or do I have to do bridging then? Thanks in advance, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLBAIgfg746kcGBOwRAme2AJ4/YCZ9KvAOCxf3uAFpqRcMWwsQvwCfdW8m D5DDWhsPshDy3maPXOiXALY= =QzDC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
