On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Alastair Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems the problems were transitory as I have now reinstalled the > packages and everything works perfectly. This is a very great improvement > over the old system, great work. > > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Alastair Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I will remove and reinstall the vzpkg2 pkg-cacher-sa and vztmpl2-centos >> and try again, however, It looks like your provides has gone down again >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Robert Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Alastair Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Cc:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:39 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: [Users] New pkg-cacher and vztmpl2 >>> >>> I think there may be an error in the vztmpl2-centos package: >>> >>> I just tried to build a centos-5-x86_64-default template and encountered >>> problems: >>> >>> >>>> http://Depweb-a.ite.gmu.edu:3142/openvz/centos/5/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: >>>> [Errno 4] Socket Error: timed out >>>> Trying other mirror. >>>> Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: >>>> centos-vz-addons. Please verify its path and try again >>>> ERROR: Command yum check-update failed with 1 exit code >>>> >>> >>> I believe there is an error in the /vz/template/centos/config/vzpkg.conf >>> file >>> >>> >>> Sounds like depweb-a.ite.gmu.edu isn't running pkg-cacher. Did you >>> install it using "yum install pkg-cacher-sa"? If it is running check >>> /var/log/pkg-cacher/error.log for any problems. >>> >>> >>> >>> I resolved the problem by changing this entries like >>> >>> [centos-vz-addons] >>>> name=OpenVZ add-ons for $OS_NAME $OS_VER - $OS_ARCH >>>> baseurl=http://$VZPKG_CACHE_HOST/openvz/$OS_NAME/$OS_VER/$OS_ARCH/ >>>> enabled=1 >>>> gpgcheck=1 >>>> gpgkey=http://repo.opensource-sw.net/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-ossw.asc >>>> >>> >>> to: >>> >>> [centos-vz-addons] >>>> name=OpenVZ add-ons for $OS_NAME $OS_VER - $OS_ARCH >>>> baseurl=http://rep.opensource-sw.net/$OS_NAME/$OS_VER/$OS_ARCH/ >>>> enabled=1 >>>> gpgcheck=1 >>>> gpgkey=http://repo.opensource-sw.net/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-ossw.asc >>> >>> >>> >>> does this make sense? >>> >>> <snip> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >> > curiously I have built the same templates back to back on two machines with machine depweb-a using depweb-b as pkg-cacher. The machines are identical, same manufacturer, same CPUs, same memory, same OS version and release (centos 5.2). On Depweb-a the compressed template images are consitantly slightly larger than on DepWeb-b; DepWeb-a: > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 20 12:41 . > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Nov 19 14:51 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 148930893 Nov 20 11:30 > centos-5-x86_64-default.tar.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 48647062 Nov 20 11:32 > centos-5-x86_64-minimal.tar.gz > > DepWeb-b: > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 20 12:42 . > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Nov 19 12:56 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 148856710 Nov 20 11:22 > centos-5-x86_64-default.tar.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 48594329 Nov 20 12:41 > centos-5-x86_64-minimal.tar.gz > any ideas what is causing the difference. I checked and the uncompressed sizes match.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
