At 01:18 06/01/2015 -0800, Michael Crawford wrote:
If user error can lead to a crash, that crash is ultimately the fault of the software developer.

No. If a user powers down a system without closing down properly, that is not the fault of the software. If a user is impatient and kills a running process, that is not the fault of the software.

If the problem is a bad memory module, then the fault lies with the electrical engineer who designed it, or with the manufacturer.

So *not* the software developer, then.

The user would only be to blame if he handled or installed the memory improperly, say by not observing antistatic procedure.

So that wouldn't be down to the software developer, then?

Or processor overheating.

Then the fault would lie with the engineer who designed the computer, unless the user blocked the ventilation holes.

So (in either case) not with the software developer, then?

Or disk corruption.

That's likely the fault of the software developer who wrote the filesystem code.

So *not* the software developer (of the application software) that we are talking about.

Or (Windows) registry corruption.

That's Microsoft's fault for making such a critical system component so vulnerable to corruption.

So *not* the application software developer?

Or malware.

The vulnerability of Windows to malware is largely Microsoft's fault.

So *not* the application software developer, then?

Your claim (to which I responded) was "If an end-user application crashes during normal use, it is ultimately the fault of *its* software developer" (my emphasis) - in other words, that if OpenOffice crashes it can only be down to the developer of OpenOffice. That's simply untrue - and I'm glad to see you agree with me so comprehensively.

Brian Barker

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to