Oh sweet irony, right after downloading AOO 4.0, and before one even gets a chance to install it, you get the same FUD review from a LO zealot as part of the SF.Net redirect to the reviews section... http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/1351/3ni.png
(those are SourceForge.net's user-submitted reviews, which shows the highest scoring review "vs" the lowest scoring one). Strangely, it doesn't matter if you select "most helpful" or "sorted by date" afterwards from the drop down at the bottom of that page, the displayed reviews do not change, it's always the same 5-star, one-line review that says "a great alternative" vs the 1-star review full of AOO FUD from someone who says "use LO instead". I feel tempted to write a one-star review that reads "I'm a LibreOffice troll and I hate to see AOO 4.0 released!" and see if it gets displayed :-P. FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act - George Orwell --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org
