On 01/21/2013 11:29 AM, Eric Fenster wrote:
Try /View /Non printing characters.  This allows one to exactly position the 
cursor.

That's totally different. It shows paragraph breaks and spaces, not formatting 
codes.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@openoffice.apache.org

What difference does it make? LO does not have formatting codes. Why insist that it should? If you miss the way WP works as a text editor, why don't you use WP? How much work would it take to develop them? Is this really worth the expense, time, etc. to do it? What are you willing to do to help? Why not learn how to use LO better? There seems to be several people who would like formatting codes. Why don't this group get together and build an extension that will do what you want it to do? Show us that it can be done. Yes, I am disappointed with this continued discussion of why format codes are better than styles. Of course it is very likely that some information about what has to be done when using formatting codes is not included. And yes, some information is also left out when mentioning what has to be done when using styles. A real test is to take a 1000 word text document with 100 formatting errors. A correct version of the document must be available so that the people making the corrections know what the final formatting should be. List how to correct the errors using formatting codes. Then list how to correct the errors using styles. Then compare how many steps each one of these took. How much time did it take to do each one? It is easy to make statements about either one, and this has been done recently as well as when there was an extended discussion about this same issue. Very little if anything has been said that was not said one time and usually many times then.

--Dan

Reply via email to