There are no JRE downloads after Java 8. You are expected to bundle Java with your application.
Scott > On Sep 30, 2019, at 12:39 PM, Derik Devecchio <ddevecc...@celestron.com> > wrote: > > I know that the Netbeans’s forum doesn’t maintain Java.com > <http://java.com/>. But I don’t know anyone else to ask off hand. > > I went to Java.com <http://java.com/> to find out the “latest public stable > release”. I was expecting Java 9 point something. But I was hoping for > 10, 11 or maybe 12. Low and behold it is still on Java8 u 221? > > > Isn’t Java 9 stable enough for public? As a person that writes software for > the customers of my company, I am loath to write code using a version of Java > that won’t be compatible with what most people already have installed on > their machine. And if they don’t have any version of Java installed on > their computer, which is increasingly the case, then my code should be > compatible with the JRE they download from the most obvious place, Java.com > <http://java.com/>. > > I was just wondering if maybe Java.com <http://java.com/> wasn’t the right > place anymore. It doesn’t seem like the site is stagnate. 8u221 was > released just a few months ago. But why 8? If anyone has a clue, I would > appreciate some enlightenment. > > > — > derik > > P.S. Great work bringing such a huge project over to the Apache framework. > I thought it would be a lot easier than it is. I have watched some fo the > videos of Gertjan discussing the mind bogglingly large amount of tedious work > involved. I applaud your efforts.
