Hi Michael, Michael McCallum wrote on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 12:34 AM:
> IMO the log4j, logkit, avalon dependencies all need to go... I as I > imagine most people do only use one logging implementation in the > deployed systems why introduce a dependency on several > implementations at the top level? They are optional, so you do not depend on them transitively. > check out http://www.slf4j.com for an appropriate break up of the > artifacts and use cases Commons logging has a different philosophy. But this is OT for this list. > I've generally stopped using dependencyManagement in favour of > dependency composition Why? Only with dependencyManagement you're able to manage transitive versions. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
