IIUC the point was, that the groupId should be javax.xml and not
java.xml.bind (the link given for this currently yields Application
error (Rails)) .
I reported the proxies/settings.xml error as MNG-2305.
Greetings
Franz
Malachi de Ælfweald schrieb:
Yeah, I definitely agree that it should be under javax
instead of com.sun -- but that's just because com.sun is supposedly
reserved for Sun internal; whereas javax is reserved for JCP-authorized
extensions.
Regarding the proxy bit.. So it seems like the correct solution would
be if there is a way we can setup ibilio to MIRROR the java.net archive; instead of maintaining
seperate copies...? Or for whatever process delivers it to java.net to deliver it to ibiblio as
well.... hmmm...
BTW: Have you reported the Maven bug?
Malachi
On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Regarding
the location (javax.xml.bind versus java.xml) i had a mail
sent by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in mind saying
.
.
.
Please note, that the policy for the groupId is "javax.xml" and
"com.sun.xml" only. See also
http://www.mavenregistry.com/search/artifacts?hl=en&q=jsr173&btnG=Search+Registry
.
.
.
Hosting at java.net is not appropriate
for me, because i sit behind a
proxy and there is an error in maven2 to the extent that only the first
proxy is considered in settings.xml (this is MNG-2305).
Since access to http sites is indispensable i thus cannot access https
sites with maven2.
Greetings
Franz
Malachi de Ælfweald schrieb:
> We should be using the latest version of JAXB, which is 2.0.2 as
per the
> website. Personally, I was not aware that the jars made it onto
> ibilio -- I
> thought they were supposed to be hosted at java.net?
>
> Out of curiousity, why would javax.xml.bind be incorrect for XML
> Databinding?
>
> Malachi
>
> On 8/11/06, Franz Fehringer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Are there any current activities for enabling JAXB2 support in
Maven2?
>> In
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/javax/xml/ there are jaxb-api
jaxb-impl
>> jaxb-xjc, but they still contain only 2.0EA3.
>> Since 17. of july there is an additional subdirectory bind,
but there
>> are
>> several things wrong/missing with this:
>>
>> - jaxb-impl and jaxb-xjc are missing.
>> - version is 2.0; 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 have appeared in the
meantime.
>> - it has been mentioned on this list, that the location
>> javax/xml/bind is wrong, javax/xml is the correct one.
>>
>> Will there be any progress/cleanup for this?
>>
>> Thanks and best regards
>>
>> Franz
>>
>>
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
