On 6/26/06, Jeff Mutonho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Whats wrong with this scm connection string :
<scm>
<connection>
scm:cvs:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/cvsroot
</connection>
<developerConnection>
scm:cvs:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/lib/cvsroot
</developerConnection>
</scm>
lacking module ?
http://maven.apache.org/scm/cvs.html
In any case , what the difference between <connection> and
<developerConnection>?
http://maven.apache.org/ref/current/maven-model/maven.html#class_scm
The distinction is mostly for security reasons and in small enterprise
setups you don't see the difference, although a guest connection might
be useful for giving access to tools (like your issue tracker, your
web scm, ...).
For those who don't want this granularity, it would seem logical (to
me) to have to define only the developer one when there's no
distinction between both. Hence issues like
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-196
Cheers,
Jerome
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
