On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:30:32 +0200, Jeff Mutonho wrote:

> Hmmm...so it means there's no way M2 takes unversioned jars , like M1
> could?

No idea, but if that's really the case everybody trying to bundle WAR/RARs
and using javamail-1.4 (which is now in java.net's maven repo) will have a
really good time trying to bundle an extra unversioned activation.jar,
since that's what javamail-1.4 references in its META-INF. I just had to
keep my own copy for a maven1 project where I could at least explicitly
specify the unversioned name.

One way would be a fix to the WAR/RAR/etc goals to pull in the dependency
with version as usual, but use an optional "archivedName" property for the
final file name in the archive.

Holger



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to