Done. -dh
-----Original Message----- From: Edwin Punzalan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 10:41 PM To: Maven Users List Subject: Re: [m2.0.4] Possible bug in idea plugin? Please file this jira and we'll have a look. If you can, please attach a test case. Thanks. Dave Hoffer wrote: > My project is a multi-module maven/IDEA project. > > One of the modules has a dependency on a locally deployed artifact where > the current version is xrite-colorlib-api-1.1. I want to specify 1.1 as > the minimum version as that version has what I need but subsequent > versions are likely to be okay as well. Using set notation works well > for install/deploy/release goals and must not cause failures for the > idea goal. > > When I ran the idea goal here is what I found: > - The main module that had a dependency on xrite-colorlib-api (using > [1.1,) did not work at all. I.e. it made the IDEA module but it had > none of it's dependencies. > - At least one other module that had a build dependency on the prior > module, had a dependency on xrite-colorlib-api-1.2-SNAPSHOT which is a > bogus version. No snapshot of this artifact exists. In any case, it > should not choose to use a snapshot when a released version is > specified. > > As to your question of if it should reach out to the defined repos and > use the most up-to-date version; I would think this would be ideal (if > not required). I think the rule should be that it should create IDEA > projects that are exactly equivalent to what maven would use/build if I > ran the install goal for example. How else could developers, using > maven to generate IDEA projects, ever stay in sync with what maven is > building? > > -dh > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wayne Fay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 10:12 PM > To: Maven Users List > Subject: Re: [m2.0.4] Possible bug in idea plugin? > > What exactly happens when you use [1.1,)? Do you get an error message > and it fails to build the IDEA project file (*.ipr iirc), or the file > is built but the dependencies are wrong, or what exactly is the result > and how is it different from what you'd expect? To properly decide if > this is really a bug, we'll probably need more of these kinds of > details, and you'll certainly need to provide them if you decide to > file a real bug report in JIRA. > > And assuming it is simply a bug in the plugin, what do you expect the > plugin to do? Simply use the minimum version specified (in this case > 1.1) or reach out to the defined repos, find the most recent version > number, and use it? > > Wayne > > On 5/31/06, Dave Hoffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> When I run idea:idea on my pom file it does not correctly handle >> dependencies that use set notation to specify the required version, >> > i.e. > >> [1.1,). If I change to 1.1 it works just fine. I have tried the new >> 2.0 IDEA plugin and it didn't make any difference. >> >> >> >> Am I doing something wrong or is this a bug? >> >> >> >> -dh >> >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
