Network latency is the biggest slow point. At this point last year, Maven was faster assuming you had all your dependencies. Recent tests say the releases have slowed a small amount, which we'll look to address in future 2.x releases.
However, the difference in speed between Maven and Ant is always dwarfed by the time it takes to compile source and run tests, so it generally isn't a concern. - Brett On 5/13/06, Mick Knutson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am writing up a general proposal about the benefits of Maven over Ant. And I guess I have not seen heaps of weel written Ant scripts at my clients as I always seem to think that Maven has been faster. But I just need numbers to detail the actual benefit. --- Thank You Mick Knutson BASE logic, inc. (415) 648-1804 (San Francisco, CA) http://www.BASELogic.com http://www.djmick.com --- >From: Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Maven Users List" <[email protected]> >To: Maven Users List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: speed comparisons from maven 2 to Ant? >Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 01:07:54 +0200 > >Mick Knutson wrote: > > > Does anyone have speed comparisons between maven 2 and Ant? > >What for? It is quite obvious, that a well written Ant script is much >faster. If you use Maven, then you need to be convinced by other >advantages. > >Jochen > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
