Re: Optional dependencies

[ir. ing. Jan Dockx]

Frankly, I have no idea ;-). I knew the tag existed, but have no experience with it yet, although I do recognize your problem (see http://cvs.peopleware.be/training/maven/maven2/dependencies.html, Issues). I briefly talked with Vincent Massol during JavaPolis (hi Vincent -- nice chat), and he wasn't aware of this tag either. Furthermore, I can't find any real documentation on this tag. It seems like "somebody" saw the issue, added the tag, and left it there? I hoped you would report back with some experience though ;-).

What is particularly puzzling to me, is how the <optional /> tag interacts with the dependency scopes.


On 1 Jan 2006, at 20:39, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:

ir. ing. Jan Dockx wrote:

Have you tried the <optional /> tag for the dependency?

Thank you. To be honest, I wasn't aware of this tag.

Reading through the docs, I do, however, believe, that it is a partial solution only, isn't it? I'd prefer a solution where Maven automatically detects the presence or absence of some classes and performs the required steps.


Jochen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<x-tad-smaller>Met vriendelijke groeten,

Jan Dockx
</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>
PeopleWare NV - Head Office</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>
Cdt.Weynsstraat 85
B-2660 Hoboken
Tel: +32 3 448.33.38
Fax: +32 3 448.32.66 </x-tad-smaller><x-tad-bigger>
</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-smaller>
PeopleWare NV - Branch Office Geel</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>
Kleinhoefstraat 5
B-2440 Geel
Tel: +32 14 57.00.90
Fax: +32 14 58.13.25</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-bigger>
</x-tad-bigger><x-tad-smaller>
http://www.peopleware.be/
</x-tad-smaller><x-tad-smaller>http://www.mobileware.be/</x-tad-smaller>

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature