If these dependencies are OSS just upload them to central.. Even under your
own groupId if you feel uncomfortable pushing under the originating
projects gId

On Wednesday, 6 February 2013, Toolforger wrote:

> Am 06.02.2013 21:19, schrieb Baptiste MATHUS:
>
>> 2013/2/6 Toolforger <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>> Am 06.02.2013 19:03, schrieb Baptiste Mathus:
>>>
>>>   Stop resisting ;). There're not. At least there are no *simpler*
>>>
>>>> alternative. That's the point. :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I don't think you really followed all the messages, else you'd have
>>> noticed that do have a simpler alternative running already.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Well, I might have missed some, granted, but I actually followed it quite
>> well.
>> And I'll also keep saying it: using a MRM is the simplest way to go.
>>
>> When I read things like someone have a snapshot locally and one other
>> doesn't, we exactly are on the subject: use a MRM and just don't care
>> about
>> the local cache.
>> Anything else is a hack that will eventually backfire.
>>
>
> If that's what you think: That's okay.
>
> Just to reiterate the point at which the discussion ended:
> I said I can't have a common MRM-managed repository, there's simply no
> server and no budget for a server. What I didn't mention yet is that once I
> can sell the software, or the services, and (hopefully) open-source the
> whole thing, this will change, but that point is months away, and I need to
> deal with the situation as it is now, not as it will be.
>
> Just repeating arguments that others have already given multiple times, ad
> nauseam, won't help.
> Find new arguments and I'll listen.
>
> Just to show that I'm not 100% unreasonable: We do have servers at work,
> and I will give Nexus a try there.
> However, I still need to solve the situation for my free time project, and
> reiterating old arguments is not the way to help.
>
> Thanks for reading.
> Jo
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to