Re: dependency version (Newbie)

Mon, 25 Aug 2003 22:36:29 +0000

You would be better using the <jar> tag rather than <version> (which is intended for version numbers).

That aside, I would guess that you have something inconsistent between your repository structure and the dependencies you've listed.

For example, are they really all under the group "jmx" as you have them here (as opposed to "jboss")?

Luke.

Andrew Boyd wrote: 
Hi,
  I have the following jars
jboss-common.jar
jboss-jmx-core.jar
jboss-jmx-services.jar
jboss-jmx.jar

Since Maven requires a version I wrote my dependencies as such:
        <dependency>
            <groupId>jmx</groupId>
            <artifactId>jboss</artifactId>
            <version>common</version>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>jmx</groupId>
            <artifactId>jboss</artifactId>
            <version>jmx</version>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>jmx</groupId>
            <artifactId>jboss-jmx</artifactId>
            <version>core</version>
        </dependency>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>jmx</groupId>
            <artifactId>jboss-jmx</artifactId>
            <version>services</version>
        </dependency>

Now when Maven retrieves from the maven.repo.remote
it only retrieves Attempting to download jboss-common.jar.
...........
Attempting to download jboss-jmx-core.jar.
.......................................

It then obviously does not compile. I checked the local repository and those are the only two in the jmx/jars dir.

Any suggestions?


--
 Luke Taylor.                      Monkey Machine Ltd.
 PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523C            http://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to