Thanks for the info... we may be looking to use Marmotta for a project but
was concerned about some the bugs I've encountered out of the box. For
example, mysql doesn't seem to have a 'triples' table when I select that
for the KiWi back-end... I had to create this manually. And even the
Postgres setup gives some error I tried to track down. All in all, the
feature set here is very close to what my needs are, but the above, and
some performance issues with SPARQL when I tested it made me shy away. I'm
willing to work on it to get things going, but I do have to consider other
alternatives, at least other graph db's, if not full blown LDP platforms.
I'd love to hear more updates and chatter here (and on the dev channel). I
think going to RDF4J is a great start too - and maybe I can try to fix the
mysql and Postgres issues once I track down where those DDL files are.

Thanks again!
Alan






On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 3:49 PM Xavier Sumba <xavier.sumb...@ucuenca.edu.ec>
wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> We can propose something for GSoC 2019 with the aims of reviving the
> project and attract contributors. What do you think Jakob?
>
> I can try to finish the migration to RDF4J if I find some free time. :D
>
> In the meantime Alan, if you'd like to contribute with something the
> migration is a good start [1], and IMHO, it was a matter of moving to the
> version 3.4.0 and solving some naming conventions. I think for now we can
> avoid the experimental backends.
>
>
> Best,
> Xavier
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/marmotta/pull/31
>
>
> > On Feb 27, 2019, at 15:22, Jakob Frank <jakob.fr...@redlink.co> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alan,
> >
> > I'd say dormant, not dead.
> >
> > To be frank: Development activities have been rather low in the past
> months.
> > Any help is appreciated, so if you'd like to contribute something you
> > are more than welcome!
> >
> > Best,
> > Jakob
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 15:27, Alan Snyder <alan8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Aaron.. just to be clear.. Is Marmotta a dead project now? There
> was just a release in June for 3.4.0 so I hoped there'd be some momentum..
> any plans for future work here?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 9:03 AM Aaron Coburn <acob...@amherst.edu> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> if you are looking for an LDP server, the Apache Annotator project
> (Web Annotation Protocol sits atop LDP) has a list of implementations on
> this page:
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/LDP-and-Web-Annotation-Protocol-Implementations
> >>>
> >>> Other than Virtuoso, which is a commercial product, all of the
> projects listed are Apache 2 licensed.
> >>>
> >>> -Aaron
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 3:20 PM Alan Snyder <alan8...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi, just wondering if this project is still active? I don't see any
> activity in the mailing list archives. Is there another venue for
> communication with the team? And if the project isn't worked on routinely,
> is there another platform recommended to use with similar features /
> license?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>> Alan
> >>>>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jakob Frank
> > | http://redlink.at
> > | m: +43 699 10588742 | e: jakob.fr...@redlink.at
> > | http://at.linkedin.com/in/jakobfrank
>
>
> --
> Advertencia legal:
> Este mensaje y, en su caso, los archivos anexos son
> confidenciales, especialmente en lo que respecta a los datos personales, y
> se dirigen exclusivamente al destinatario referenciado. Si usted no lo es
> y
> lo ha recibido por error o tiene conocimiento del mismo por cualquier
> motivo, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por este medio y proceda a
> destruirlo o borrarlo, y que en todo caso se abstenga de utilizar,
> reproducir, alterar, archivar o comunicar a terceros el presente mensaje y
> ficheros anexos, todo ello bajo pena de incurrir en responsabilidades
> legales. Las opiniones contenidas en este mensaje y en los archivos
> adjuntos, pertenecen exclusivamente a su remitente y no representan la
> opinión de la Universidad de Cuenca salvo que se diga expresamente y el
> remitente esté autorizado para ello. El emisor no garantiza la integridad,
> rapidez o seguridad del presente correo, ni se responsabiliza de posibles
> perjuicios derivados de la captura, incorporaciones de virus o
> cualesquiera
> otras manipulaciones efectuadas por terceros.
>

Reply via email to