Hi, On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Frans Knibbe <frans.kni...@geodan.nl> wrote: > > In my few experiments so far, the requested URI is described in the > response. For example, if I request > http://www.example.com/my_dataset/resource123, the response contains the > triples in which http://www.example.com/my_dataset/resource123 is the > subject. >
Yes, for your particular case, because you manually imported it with that URI. But may not be the case all resources loaded into Marmotta. That's why I warn you. > I have tried the Linked Data validator at http://vafu.redlink.io/. The > only tests that fail are those in which the request does not specify a > content type. > You should active the option "Tests if the RDF responses contain meaningful data" to check if the data is actually there. Then you may see it. I wonder if I can get rid of the first 302... But is there anything that > goes against Linked Data principles this way? > Debatable, yes, nothing to discuss in this context. The formal background if that W3C's TAG took the decision to go for 303 semantics on httpRange-14 issue [1]. If you want to fix it, just use the R flag [2] in your RewriteRule: [R=303] [1] https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/httpRange-14/2007-05-31/HttpRange-14 [2] https://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/rewrite/flags.html#flag_r Cheers, -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co w: http://redlink.co
