+1 when you'll start coding, please point the fork here to get some help
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:08 AM, Rob Atkinson <r...@metalinkage.com.au> wrote: > I've added a JIRA ticket for this at: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-630 > > In terms of interoperability - the standardisation of such APIs is a > design-time consideration: do we allow users to map arbitrary URI > templates to queries - or do we impose some well-known semantics? > > LinkedDataAPI has some standardised parameters: _view, _format and > _language being the most relevant ones here. > > I'm in favour of a template-driven option, with default behaviour to > support the LDA spec (or something that provides the same functionality and > is managed by W3C or IETF etc). It might be possible to pre-define > templates that match existing options (LDA, graphity, pubby) and give the > user a choice. > > this would allow default behaviour to converge on standardised API design, > but allow flexibility in an uncertain world. > > Cheers > Rob Atkinson > > > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 at 23:23 Bohms, H.M. (Michel) <michel.bo...@tno.nl> > wrote: > >> Think such functionalities would be VERY handy, just one check. >> >> >> >> Would it in any way compromise interoperability? >> >> (ie less then pure sparql interface) >> >> >> >> Ie would it involve specific agreements on how to map services to queries >> etc. not covered by standards? >> >> >> >> Gr Michel; >> >> >> >> >> >> Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms >> Sr. Research Scientist >> Structural Reliability >> >> T +31 (0)88 866 31 07 >> M +31 (0)63 038 12 20 >> E michel.bo...@tno.nl >> >> Location <http://www.tno.nl/locaties/DTM> >> >> >> >> <http://www.tno.nl/> >> >> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you >> are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you >> are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no >> liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use >> it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the >> electronic transmission of messages. >> >> >> >> *From:* Sergio Fernández [mailto:wik...@apache.org] >> *Sent:* 19 February 2016 09:04 >> *To:* users@marmotta.apache.org >> *Cc:* Rob Atkinson >> >> >> *Subject:* Re: Support for RDF-shapes, Linked data API >> >> >> >> Hi Rob and Robson, >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Rob Atkinson <r...@metalinkage.com.au> >> wrote: >> >> So - no one else on the users list wishes to add anything? - 2 of 2 >> people seem to think predetermined queries are a necessary function - any >> thoughts on whether this might end up as a Marmotta capability (module) , >> or at a minimum as a Use Case for Marmotta that should be articulated? >> >> >> >> I've been reading this thread very interested. Thanks for such good >> discussion. Sorry if I didn't have the change to jump it; this is been a >> very busy week. >> >> >> >> Should I take this to the dev list to see if any of the developer's have >> thought about this - or are you all represented here? >> >> >> >> Yes, you should! >> >> >> >> Depending on the scope, I'm not sure if this feature would require a new >> module or just add it to the SPARQL module, that's something to discuss. >> >> >> >> Normally the workflow is: >> >> 1. Discuss it at dev@marmotta >> >> 2. Create an issue at Jira >> >> 3. Fork our repo at GitHub >> >> 4. Work! >> >> 5. PR >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Sergio Fernández >> Partner Technology Manager >> Redlink GmbH >> m: +43 6602747925 >> e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co >> w: http://redlink.co >> > -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925 e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co w: http://redlink.co
