Ok, thx! It works now (guess there will be an update sometime fixing this bug?)
Greetings Michel Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Bohms Sr. Research Scientist Structural Reliability T +31 (0)88 866 31 07 M +31 (0)63 038 12 20 E michel.bo...@tno.nl This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. -----Original Message----- From: Sergio Fernández [mailto:wik...@apache.org] Sent: woensdag 21 januari 2015 9:46 To: users@marmotta.apache.org Cc: Taal, J. (Johan) Subject: Re: issue on security Hi, On 21/01/15 09:39, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote: > Indeed quite simple....the atual issue is/was: > > In my configuration file there exists no security.enabled property at > all :) > > So...should it be there or is it default true and I now add this > property (with value false) The default value is true in case of missing configuration, yes. Doing that via the configuration request means you do not need to care about such manual details. So usually always preferable. Cheers, -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 660 2747 925 e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co w: http://redlink.co
