Hi Joshua, why not "just" import the protein data into marmotta? For better separation you could import every protein into it's own context/named graph...
Best, Jakob On 4 September 2014 17:04, Joshua Dunham <joshua_dun...@vrtx.com> wrote: > Hi Marmotta Users/Admins, > > I’m wondering if the linked data cache module can have it’s behavior > slightly changed. I’d like to keep the data forever unless there is a change > on the source end, in which case it could update. I was also wondering if it > could be cached in the graph somewhat based on the rdf resource name, and if > it could be included in direct indexing. > > My use case is, I have a subject which links to a uniprot protein. The > target link is http://uniprot.org/unprot/proteinId.rdf for each proteinId. > Ideally when the subject is loaded into marmotta, the service will activate > and start to import these referred resources. I could later come in and say, > my measurement yielded a protein weight of 7000, let’s sparql search for > possible proteins. > > Maybe this is already possible with the current state of LDCaching? > > -J > > > > Joshua Dunham > Scientific Computing | Vertex > E: joshua_dun...@vrtx.com > P: 617-229-5157 > W: http://www.vrtx.com > L: http://linkedin.com/in/joshuadunham > S: joshua.dunham > > This email message and any attachments are confidential and intended for use > by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please > notify me immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of > this message and any attachments. Thank you.
