Hi Sergio, Apologies, my email client reversed the thread so I didn’t see your message until I sent mine, whoops!
This latest did not solve MARMOTTA-499. Browser (Firefox 32.0a2 (2014-06-30)) error is The stylesheet http://---------.vrtx.com:8080/core/public/style/blue/javadoc.css was not loaded because its MIME type, "application/x-pointplus", is not "text/css". proxy.js:300 The stylesheet http://---------.vrtx.com:8080/core/public/style/blue/style.css was not loaded because its MIME type, "application/x-pointplus", is not "text/css". proxy.js:300 The stylesheet http://----------.vrtx.com:8080/user/admin/style/style.css was not loaded because its MIME type, "application/x-pointplus", is not "text/css”. proxy.js:300 CSS is also not rendered in Safari 7.0.4 (9537.76.4) but there is no error message. Chrome says similar, Resource interpreted as Stylesheet but transferred with MIME type application/x-pointplus: "http://--------.vrtx.com:8080/core/public/style/blue/javadoc.css";. about.html:9 Resource interpreted as Stylesheet but transferred with MIME type application/x-pointplus: "http://--------.vrtx.com:8080/core/public/style/blue/style.css";. about.html:10 Resource interpreted as Stylesheet but transferred with MIME type application/x-pointplus: "http://--------.vrtx.com:8080/user/admin/style/style.css";. about.html:20 I’ve tried to enable debug logging but there was no writes in this log, not sure I’ve enabled correctly (-Droot-level=debug). Don’t hesitate to ask for assistance to bug test this or any bug, I can turn around a few tests per day. Thanks!, J Joshua Dunham Scientific Computing | Vertex E: joshua_dun...@vrtx.com P: 617-229-5157 W: http://www.vrtx.com L: http://linkedin.com/in/joshuadunham S: joshua.dunham On Jul 8, 2014, at 9:42 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: > Joshua,, > > On 08/07/14 15:34, Joshua Dunham wrote: >> Mozilla and Chrome docs say they used to honor just the file >> extension being CSS but specifically disabled this for security >> concerns. The cutover was a few months back. A very quick hack is to >> remove the x-point plus line altogether but you can also reverse the >> order of the two params in the mime-type properties and it will send >> type CSS. I'm not sure how tomcat would decide which of the two type >> names to send along without putting the type in the CSS header as a >> comment? > > That's the know issue, right? > > Please, check my instructions (email at 10:38) to see if that actually solves > MARMOTTA-499. > > -- > Sergio Fernández > Senior Researcher > Knowledge and Media Technologies > Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH > Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/3 | 5020 Salzburg, Austria > T: +43 662 2288 318 | M: +43 660 2747 925 > sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://www.salzburgresearch.at/&k=nlnsHLn0ybmZ0IJA5X3Bfg%3D%3D%0A&r=Ti2ZOdevHxjcPRKaSErKsJsdngV4bllmizMzlKHBb0U%3D%0A&m=5UGPgHb4ChgtVHIYO49%2F1avYI7NvJh%2FxLdB54WMiF4I%3D%0A&s=bcc18a5647a7b1eec5451f0df54fb31c903147a167e8722729ed3c261bd60ac8 > > -- > Sergio Fernández > Partner Technology Manager > Redlink GmbH > m: +43 660 2747 925 > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co > w: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://redlink.co/&k=nlnsHLn0ybmZ0IJA5X3Bfg%3D%3D%0A&r=Ti2ZOdevHxjcPRKaSErKsJsdngV4bllmizMzlKHBb0U%3D%0A&m=5UGPgHb4ChgtVHIYO49%2F1avYI7NvJh%2FxLdB54WMiF4I%3D%0A&s=2d0af64cee6e5a6fb634698f6e73b01e3d331d15a3c720d24d6122ff43abb668 This email message and any attachments are confidential and intended for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.
